Infections in breast implants: a review with a focus on developing countries

Authors

  • Corrado Rubino Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
  • Sergio Brongo Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
  • Domenico Pagliara Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
  • Roberto Cuomo Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
  • Giulia Abbinante Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
  • Nicola Campitiello Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
  • Fabio Santanelli Sant'Andrea Hospital, School of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Daniela Chessa School of Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.3898

Keywords:

breast implant infections, acute infections, late infections, fungal infections, rare infections

Abstract

The risk of surgical site infection is always present in surgery; the use of prosthetic materials is linked to an increased possibility of infection. Breast augmentation and breast reconstruction with implants are gaining popularity in developing countries. Implant infection is the main complication related to breast aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. In the present paper, we reviewed the current microbiological knowledge about implant infections, with particular attention to risk factors, diagnosis, clinical management, and antibiotic prophylaxis, focusing on reports from developing countries. After breast aesthetic surgery, up to 2.9% of patients develop a surgical site infection, with an incidence of 1.7% for acute infections and 0.8% for late infections. The rate of surgical site infection after post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is usually higher, ranging from 1% to 53%. The clinical features are not constant, and bacterial culture with antibiogram is the gold standard for diagnosis and for identification of antibiotic resistance. While waiting for culture results, empiric therapy with vancomycin and extended-spectrum penicillins or cephalosporins is recommended. Some patients require removal of the infected prosthesis. The main methods to bring down the risk of infection are strict asepsis protocol, preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and irrigation of the surgical pocket and implant with an antibiotic solution.

Author Biographies

Corrado Rubino, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy

Full Professor of Plastic Surgery

Department of Medicine and Surgery, Plastic Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona

Fabio Santanelli, Sant'Andrea Hospital, School of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Full Professor of Plastic Surgery

Department of Medicine and Surgery, Plastic Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital

Daniela Chessa, School of Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy

Department of Scienze Biomediche, School of Medicine

Downloads

Published

2014-09-12

How to Cite

1.
Rubino C, Brongo S, Pagliara D, Cuomo R, Abbinante G, Campitiello N, Santanelli F, Chessa D (2014) Infections in breast implants: a review with a focus on developing countries. J Infect Dev Ctries 8:1089–1095. doi: 10.3855/jidc.3898

Issue

Section

Reviews